Formation/Cours

Logo UCL monochrome

Human Rights Litigation

The final evaluation will be based on the following components, each contributing to the overall grade according to the specified percentage:

  • Final Written Exam (moot legal submission to an international human rights body): 70%
  • Attendance and Active Participation Throughout the Course: 30%

General:

  • To provide information on international human rights sources, systems, standards and relevant issues.
  • To encourage the development of practical skills for the future professionals.
  • To sensitize participants to their particular role in protecting and promoting human rights and their own potential for affecting human rights in their future professional duties.
  • To understand the human rights principles, institutions, processes and practices, issues and methods.

Course specific:

  • Familiarise with European and international human rights standards and protection mechanisms
  • Obtain a comparative perspective on international human rights instruments
  • Understand the interplay between the various international and regional instruments and their concrete use for the purpose of human rights litigation
  • Acquire skills of human rights litigation at European level
  • Know where to search for more in-depth information and use the resources provided.

Module 1 – Litigating Human Rights Cases at the International Level: CoE, EU, and UN Protection Systems

Module 2 – Litigating Human Rights Cases at the International Level: Human Rights Litigation in Practice

Module 1 (8h)

Litigating Human Rights Cases at the International Level: CoE, EU, and UN Protection Systems

Session 1 (23 January): The Council of Europe and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR): avenues for human rights litigation

  • Overview of the Council of Europe (CoE): Mandate, institutions, and key activities.
  • Introduction to the CoE treaties and their monitoring bodies: Subject matter and implementation mechanisms.
  • The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR): Role, structure, and functioning.
  • Overview of the procedure before the ECtHR

Session 2 (30 January): The EU and the UN: avenues for human rights litigation

  • Overview of the United Nations (UN) protection system: Role, subject matter, and implementation mechanisms of UN treaties and their monitoring bodies.
  • The EU Framework: The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (EU Charter); raising a complaint under the Charter before national courts and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
  • The UN Human Rights Commitee: Role, structure and functioning
  • Overview of the individual communication procedure

Module 2 (16h)

Litigating Human Rights Cases at the International Level: Human Rights Litigation in Practice

Session 1 (06 February): Human Rights in Litigation: Hard Law and Soft Law Perspectives

  • The ECtHR perspective

    • Absolute and relative rights
    • Positive and negative obligations
    • Interpretative doctrines in the ECtHR system
    • The UN Human Rights Committee perspective

      • Immediate obligations and derogations under the ICCPR
      • Non-derogable rights
      • Duties to respect, protect, ensure
      • General Comments as interpretative tools
      • Use of comparative law, other international instrument, soft law standards

Session 2 (13 February): Bringing a Case Before the ECtHR

  • Practical aspects of lodging a complaint before the ECtHR: Rules on procedure and admissibility criteria
  • The protection against refoulement in the ECtHR system

    • Focus on: Requests for Interim Measures
    • Case studies

***

  • Prearation for the Grand Chamber hearing in the case Tergek v. Türkiye: freedom of information in the ECHR system

Session 3 (20 February): Bringing a Case Before the UN Human Rights Committee

  • Practical aspects of lodging an individual communication: Rules on procedure and admissibility criteria
  • The life cycle of an individual communication: From admissibility to adjudication and implementation
  • The protection against refoulement in the ICCPR system

    • Focus on: Requests for Provisional Measures
    • Case studies

Visit to Strasbourg (4 March): Attendance at the ECtHR Grand Chamber hearing for the case Tergek v. Türkiye (no. 39631/20)

Session 4 (11 March): Bringing a Case Before the ECtHR or the UN Human Rights Committee? Closing remarks

  • Follow-up discussion on Tergek v. Türkiye: Key takeaways

  • Cas